JDM Original
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
JDM Original

A few of my mates decided that we would start our own web site for shows and meets.
 
HomeHome  Latest imagesLatest images  SearchSearch  RegisterRegister  Log inLog in  

 

 Roots or screw

Go down 
AuthorMessage
jdmek

jdmek


Posts : 36
Join date : 2009-01-10
Age : 38
Location : bandit country

Roots or screw Empty
PostSubject: Roots or screw   Roots or screw EmptySun May 10, 2009 2:07 pm

The Roots Supercharger (aka “blower”)

The roots supercharger was originally designed as an air moving device for industrial buildings. The roots supercharger features two counter-rotating lobes that trap air from the intake side of the supercharger (normally at the back of the supercharger), move it around the outside casing of the lobes, and out the bottom of the supercharger through an outlet/discharge port. Like the twin screw supercharger, the roots is a “positive displacement” aka “fixed displacement” supercharger, meaning that it moves a fixed volume of air per rotation. Not withstanding minor amounts of air-leak at low rpms, the roots supercharger cannot flow backwards like a centrifugal supercharger, and is thus nearly as efficient in its ability to pump air at low rpmsas it is at high rpms. What this means is that roots superchargers are very capable of making large amounts of boost even when engine rpms are very low. This makes for great low-end and midrange power, and also makes them great for trucks and towing vehicles. The roots is also selflubricated, and is the simplest of the supercharger designs, meaning it is reasonably priced and very reliable. This is why roots superchargers have been the choice of GM, Ford, Mercedes, and Toyota for OE applications. The only real disadvantage to the roots supercharger is that it creates a lot of heat. There are two reasons for this. First, the roots supercharger does not compress air—it only moves from the intake port to the discharge port (i.e. it is the only supercharger design with no internal compression ratio). All of the compression is done in the intake manifold. Laws of thermodynamics kick in in favor of supercharger designs with an internal compression ratio(centrifugal and twin screw) because they do less work onthe incoming air charge.We will leave the mathematics of this phenomenon to a later (much more boring) discussion. Another reason roots superchargers create higher amounts of heat is because they tend to carry some of the compressed air in the intake back into the supercharger because it gets trapped by the rotating lobes that are exposed to the hotter air in the intake manifold. A roots supercharger (“blower”). Want to know why a roots supercharger creates more heat than a centrifugal or twin screw? Calculate the amount of work each does on the incoming air charge and measure the area underneath the curve on the Pressure Volume Graph.

Roots or screw Super-charger-fix

The Twin Screw Supercharger

The twin screw supercharger at first glance appears to look similar to a roots supercharger both inside and out. The two technologies are indeed similar, however there are significant differences. At the heart of the twin-screw supercharger are two rotors, or “screws” that rotate towards each other. The rotors mesh together and draw air from the back ofthe supercharger. The twisting rotors move the air to the front of the supercharger, while compressing the air before discharging through a port at or near the front ofthe supercharger. Because the compression is done inside the supercharger, this design produces less heat than a roots supercharger—in fact, it is almost as thermally efficient as a centrifugal design. Like the roots design, the twin-screw is a fixed displacement supercharger (meaning that it pumps a fixed volume of air per revolution), and because the tolerances between the rotating screws are very tight, its ability to create boost at low rpms is unparalleled. These characteristics make it ideal for aircraft, where low to mid range power is primary in importance. Another important advantage of the twin screw compressor is its reliability. Unlike a roots supercharger, the rotors in a twin screw supercharger do not actually touch, so there are virtually no wearing parts. For this reason, twin screw compressors are commonly used to pressurize cabins in passenger aircraft. Like roots superchargers, twin screw superchargers are self lubricatedand do not tap into the engine’s oil supply. One disadvantage of the twin screw design is that, because it has an internal compression ratio, the twin screw is compressing air even when it is not sending boost to the engine (i.e. under cruising or deceleration). An internal bypass valve releases the pressurized air, but because it takes work to pressurize the air in the first place, the twin screw supercharger draws more power from the engine than while not under boost. Like the roots, the throttle body must beplaced before the compressor because it is a fixed displacement supercharger.

Roots or screw 0808phr_02_z+2005_2007_ford_mustang_gt+twin_screw_supercharger
Back to top Go down
 
Roots or screw
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
JDM Original :: Media :: tech articles-
Jump to: